Revitalizing Pulse Production for Sustainable Farming in Pakistan

Pulse cultivation in Pakistan has a rich history that dates back to pre-independence when traditional farming practices included a diverse range of crops, including pulses. After 1947, as Pakistan sought to establish its agricultural identity, pulses remained a staple in many regions, especially in rain-fed areas. However, the focus on major cereals like wheat and rice, driven by the need for food security, led to a gradual decline in the area devoted to pulses.

The Green Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s, which introduced high-yielding varieties of wheat and rice, further marginalized pulse crops. The introduction of chemical fertilizers and pesticides favored cereals over pulses, which were often seen as secondary crops. As a result, the traditional practice of intercropping pulses with cereals diminished, and pulses were relegated to less fertile and marginal lands.

Current State of Pulse Cultivation

In contemporary Pakistan, pulses are primarily grown in rain-fed regions, covering approximately 1.17 million hectares, which constitutes about 5% of the country’s total cropping area. Chickpeas dominate this area, occupying 73% of the land devoted to pulse production. Despite their importance, the yield and production of pulses have been declining. Several factors contribute to this decline, including poor crop management practices, labor shortages, and a lack of infrastructure.

Constraints Hindering Pulse Productivity

The gap between the potential and actual yields of pulses in Pakistan can be attributed to several interrelated factors:

1. Poor Seed Quality and Availability: The availability of high-quality, disease-resistant seeds is a critical issue. Farmers often rely on seeds from local grain markets, which may not be suitable for high-yield production. The absence of a formal seed production and distribution system further exacerbates this problem. Historically, the focus on cereals has meant that less attention and fewer resources have been directed toward developing and distributing improved pulse varieties.

2. Insect Pests and Diseases: Pulses are vulnerable to various insect pests and diseases, such as pod borer and Ascochyta blight. These issues can devastate crops if not properly managed. Historically, the limited research and extension services dedicated to pulses have left farmers without adequate knowledge or resources to combat these challenges effectively.

3. Labor Shortages and Inefficient Practices: The labor-intensive nature of pulse farming, combined with high labor costs, has led to inefficiencies in production. This is especially true in weed management, where farmers often leave weeds to grow due to the high cost of manual labor. The rural-to-urban migration trend, which has accelerated since the 1980s, has further reduced the availability of labor in agricultural areas.

4. Lack of Modern Agricultural Practices: Many farmers lack access to or knowledge of modern agricultural techniques, including the use of pre-emergence herbicides, insecticides, and pesticides. This gap in knowledge and resources has been a long-standing issue, rooted in the historical marginalization of pulse crops within Pakistan’s agricultural research and extension systems.

5. Climatic Challenges: Pulses are typically grown in rain-fed areas that are more susceptible to climatic variations, such as irregular rainfall, droughts, and extreme temperatures. The unpredictability of weather patterns has made pulse farming increasingly risky. This vulnerability is compounded by the lack of infrastructure, such as irrigation facilities, that could mitigate these challenges.

Opportunities for Improvement

Despite these challenges, there are significant opportunities to revitalize pulse production in Pakistan. To do so, a multifaceted approach is required, involving improved seed varieties, modern agricultural practices, government support, and community involvement.

1. Introduction of Improved Varieties: Testing and adopting high-yielding, disease-resistant varieties of chickpeas and lentils can significantly enhance productivity. Collaborative trials involving local farmers have already shown promise in identifying suitable varieties for different regions. By building on these successes and ensuring that improved varieties are accessible to all farmers, Pakistan can close the yield gap.

2. Village-Based Seed Production Systems: Establishing local seed production systems can bridge the gap between supply and demand for quality seeds. Empowering local communities, especially women, to participate in seed production can further support this initiative. Historically, such community-based approaches have been successful in other agricultural sectors, and there is potential to replicate these successes in pulse production.

3. Mechanization and Modern Techniques: Introducing mechanized farming methods, particularly during harvesting, can alleviate labor shortages and reduce the physical strain on farmers. Training programs aimed at educating farmers on modern agricultural practices will also be crucial in improving yields. The government’s support in providing access to machinery and training will be vital in this regard.

4. Government Support and Policy Interventions: The government’s role in stabilizing pulse prices and supporting research and development in pulse cultivation is essential. With appropriate policies, the profitability of pulse farming can be enhanced, encouraging more farmers to engage in pulse production. Historically, government intervention has been critical in driving agricultural development, as seen with the Green Revolution. A similar commitment to pulses could yield substantial benefits.

5. Addressing Climatic Challenges: To mitigate the impact of climate change, it is essential to develop and promote climate-resilient pulse varieties. Additionally, investing in infrastructure such as irrigation systems and storage facilities can help farmers better manage the risks associated with climatic variability.

The Path Forward: Historical Lessons and Future Directions

The history of pulse cultivation in Pakistan offers valuable lessons for the future. The marginalization of pulses during the Green Revolution highlights the risks of focusing too narrowly on a few crops at the expense of others. To ensure sustainable agricultural development, it is crucial to adopt a more balanced approach that includes diverse crops like pulses.

The government’s role in this process cannot be overstated. Historically, successful agricultural transformations in Pakistan have been driven by strong government support, whether through research and development, price stabilization, or infrastructure investment. A similar commitment to pulse cultivation could transform this sector, leading to increased yields, improved livelihoods for farmers, and greater food security for the nation.

Moreover, community involvement, particularly the participation of women, will be key to the success of any initiative aimed at boosting pulse production. Women play a central role in many aspects of pulse farming, from planting to harvesting, and their involvement in seed production and other value-added activities could significantly enhance productivity and income.

Conclusion

Pulse production in Pakistan stands at a critical juncture. The challenges are clear, rooted in historical neglect, but so are the opportunities. By addressing the constraints related to seed quality, pest management, labor shortages, and modern agricultural practices, Pakistan can significantly boost pulse productivity. This not only holds the potential for improving the livelihoods of smallholder farmers but also contributes to national food security by providing an affordable source of protein and micronutrients to the population.

The lessons of the past must inform the actions of the present and future. With concerted efforts from the government, private sector, and farming communities, Pakistan can unlock the full potential of its pulse sector, ensuring that these vital crops play their rightful role in the country’s agricultural landscape.

Please note that the views expressed in this article are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of any organization.

Saima Rani is serving Social Sciences Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Center, Islamabad, Pakistan, Shahid Riaz Malik is serving Crop Sciences Institute, National Agricultural Research Center, Islamabad, Pakistan, and Ata ur Rehman is serving E.H. Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, School of Biomedical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia

Related Stories