Pakistan's Agricultural Sector Marker Reforms: Challenges & Reforms

Pakistan’s governance structure is riddled with inefficiencies, ambiguity, and conflicts, all of which significantly affect the country’s economy, including its pivotal agricultural sector. Political instability, bureaucratic hurdles, and corruption remain major obstacles that hinder economic development across various sectors, with agriculture being one of the most critical. Despite being the backbone of Pakistan’s economy, contributing over 24% of its GDP and employing around 37.4% of its workforce, agriculture has not received the strategic attention and exploitation it deserves. Consequently, ineffective governance has stunted not only agricultural growth but also the country's overall economic performance.

The Agricultural Produce Market (APM) of 1939: A Legacy of Restriction

One of the most glaring examples of defunct governance affecting Pakistan’s agriculture is the legal framework governing its fresh produce markets, primarily the Agricultural Produce Market (APM) of 1939. This law was originally designed to protect farmers from exploitation by middlemen and traders, ensuring fair trade practices. However, instead of evolving with the changing agricultural dynamics, the law remained rigid, becoming increasingly obsolete over the decades. It restricted market operations and created an environment where market practices became archaic and inefficient.

The goal of APM was to provide farmers with better marketing opportunities and reduce their vulnerability to market manipulation. However, the restrictive nature of this outdated legislation failed to address the changing needs of both farmers and consumers. Over time, it hindered the development of efficient market structures, leading to inefficiencies in the distribution and sale of agricultural products.

The 1978 Reform: Attempting to Restructure Market Governance

Recognizing the inefficiencies of the APM of 1939, the government of Punjab passed the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Ordinance in 1978. This legislation aimed to expand the range of products classified as agricultural produce, creating regulated markets under the supervision of committees comprising farmers and other stakeholders. However, despite its good intentions, the ordinance was far from successful. Bureaucratic red tape, corrupt practices, and insufficient physical infrastructure plagued the implementation process.

Market monopolies remained intact, preventing the very farmers the law sought to protect from achieving economic autonomy. Brokers and middlemen continued to dominate the markets, taking advantage of the disorganized and under-regulated trading environment. As a result, despite attempts to provide farmers with more structured trading platforms, they still faced challenges in accessing fair markets.

The 2010 Act: A Step Towards Modernization, but Challenges Persist

In an effort to modernize agricultural marketing, the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (Development and Modernization) Act of 2010 was introduced. This law aimed to overhaul market structures by encouraging private investment and fostering the development of competitive wholesale markets. The 2010 Act replaced the outdated 1939 legislation and sought to privatize certain aspects of the agricultural markets over a three-year transition period.

The goals of the 2010 Act included improving transparency, enhancing the coordination between producers and consumers, and making agricultural markets more efficient. However, the Act faced significant challenges in achieving these goals. Private investors were hesitant to engage with the market due to concerns about profitability and uncertainty in market regulations. Moreover, the existing infrastructure was inadequate to support the envisioned modernization efforts, and the short transition period did not allow for the proper implementation of reforms.

The 2018 Reform: The Creation of PAMRA

In 2018, the government attempted another round of reforms by creating the Punjab Agricultural Marketing Regulatory Authority (PAMRA). PAMRA’s mandate was to oversee market practices, enforce the 2010 Act, and integrate modern practices into Punjab’s agricultural markets. PAMRA aimed to create a fair and transparent market system, curbing monopolistic practices and ensuring fair competition.

However, PAMRA struggled to achieve its objectives due to inadequate funding and lack of enforcement capacity. The regulatory authority was unable to effectively modernize market practices or curb the power of entrenched market actors, such as brokers and wholesalers. Monopolistic practices persisted, and many farmers remained vulnerable to exploitation. Without proper financial and institutional support, PAMRA’s efforts to reform Pakistan’s agricultural markets remained largely ineffective.

Challenges Beyond Regulatory Issues: Inefficiencies in Inputs and Infrastructure

In addition to regulatory challenges, poor governance has also impeded the availability and affordability of essential agricultural inputs, such as fertilizers, seeds, and machinery. Pakistan’s inefficient supply chains, poor infrastructure, and lack of government intervention have made it difficult for smallholder farmers to access these critical resources. The unregulated fertilizer industry, for instance, has seen frequent price hikes, putting pressure on farmers and reducing the profitability of agriculture.

Additionally, Pakistan’s agricultural sector has been slow to adopt modern farming techniques, further hindering its competitiveness in global markets. Despite advancements in technology and farming practices worldwide, many farmers in Pakistan still rely on outdated tools and methods. This has limited their productivity and made them less competitive, both domestically and internationally. For example, many farmers continue to use traditional plowing methods rather than modern machinery, which results in lower crop yields and higher labor costs.

Economic Impact: Declining Agricultural Productivity and Rising Inefficiency

Pakistan’s declining key economic performance indicators, particularly in agriculture, reflect the broader inefficiencies stemming from poor governance. Agriculture, which contributes 24% of the country’s GDP and employs over a third of its labor force, has been in steady decline due to a combination of legislative and infrastructural issues. Ineffective agricultural policies have led to the deterioration of rural areas, with increasing numbers of people migrating to urban centers in search of better opportunities. This rural-to-urban migration has placed additional strain on the country’s already stretched urban resources, exacerbating regional inequalities and deepening poverty.

The decline in agricultural productivity has had a ripple effect on Pakistan’s broader economy, particularly in industries reliant on agricultural inputs, such as textiles and food processing. For instance, reduced crop yields have led to a decrease in the availability of raw materials for these industries, making them more expensive and less competitive on the global stage. This has negatively impacted Pakistan’s exports, inflating its fiscal and current account deficits, and slowing down overall economic growth.

Foreign Investment and Competitiveness

Pakistan’s agricultural sector, plagued by low productivity and inefficient governance, has also struggled to attract much-needed foreign investment. Investors are reluctant to engage with an industry that is not only underperforming but also lacks the regulatory framework to ensure transparency and profitability. The absence of private sector involvement further hinders innovation and technical advancement, leaving Pakistan’s agriculture lagging behind its international competitors.

Governance Reforms as the Path to Economic Revival

To break the cycle of inefficiency, poor productivity, and economic stagnation, Pakistan must undertake significant governance reforms. These reforms should focus on modernizing the agricultural sector, ensuring transparency, and creating an environment that encourages private investment. To achieve this, the government must strengthen institutions such as PAMRA, providing them with the necessary resources and enforcement capacity to regulate markets effectively and curb monopolistic practices.

Moreover, the government should prioritize infrastructure development, particularly in rural areas, to improve access to agricultural inputs and markets. Investment in transportation, storage facilities, and supply chain logistics would help reduce costs for farmers and increase their competitiveness. Additionally, public policies should encourage private sector investment in agriculture by providing incentives and reducing market uncertainty.

Climate Change and Policy Implementation

Another critical aspect of improving Pakistan’s agricultural governance is addressing the challenges posed by climate change. Changing weather patterns, water scarcity, and soil degradation are all factors that threaten agricultural productivity in Pakistan. Timely and effective policy implementation, along with investments in sustainable farming practices, can help mitigate the impacts of climate change and enhance the country’s food security.

A Call for Strategic Reforms

In conclusion, Pakistan’s agricultural sector, despite its immense potential, continues to underperform due to defunct market governance and rising economic inefficiency. Outdated legislation, ineffective regulatory bodies, and poor infrastructure have all contributed to the sector’s decline. Without significant governance reforms and investment in modern agricultural practices, Pakistan’s economic growth will remain stagnated. By addressing these challenges, the country can unlock the full potential of its agricultural sector, reduce food insecurity, and foster sustainable economic development.

Please note that the views expressed in this article are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of any organization.

Mubashra Saman is a Lecturer and Abdul Ghafoor is an Associate Professor at the Institute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Related Stories