Enhancing Resource Use Efficiency in Smallholder Farms

Smallholder farms are the backbone of global food systems, particularly in developing countries where they represent over 80% of all farms and produce more than 70% of the food consumed in regions like Asia and sub-Saharan Africa (FAO, 2021). These farms are critical to food security, rural employment, and poverty alleviation. Despite their importance, smallholder farmers continue to struggle with systemic barriers that suppress productivity and economic viability. Among these, inefficient resource use is one of the most persistent and impactful constraints. Many smallholders operate on marginal lands with limited access to irrigation, inputs, and capital, resulting in suboptimal crop yields and continued economic vulnerability.

Resource use efficiency (RUE) refers to the effective utilization of key agricultural inputs, land, water, labor, fertilizers, and financial resources, to produce maximum output with minimal waste or environmental degradation. Enhancing RUE is not only essential for boosting farm-level productivity and profitability but also for promoting climate-smart and environmentally sustainable agriculture. However, RUE among smallholders is frequently limited by low levels of education, lack of access to extension services, inadequate infrastructure, and fragmented markets.

Addressing these issues requires a multifaceted approach. Technological interventions such as precision farming, drip irrigation, and mobile-based advisory services can help optimize input use. Policy reforms, including targeted subsidies, access to credit, and land tenure security, can remove structural barriers to investment. Additionally, strengthening farmer cooperatives, encouraging participatory research, and promoting gender-inclusive training can enhance social capital and enable more equitable resource distribution. By improving RUE, smallholder farms can transition from survival-based operations to resilient, market-oriented enterprises that contribute meaningfully to global food systems and sustainable development. This article delves into the dimensions, limitations, and opportunities of resource use efficiency, with a focus on empowering smallholders to overcome constraints and achieve long-term agricultural sustainability.

Dimensions of Resource Use Efficiency

Resource Use Efficiency (RUE) in agriculture encompasses three interrelated dimensions: technical, allocative, and economic efficiency. These dimensions provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating how effectively smallholder farmers utilize limited resources to achieve optimal productivity and profitability.

Technical efficiency refers to a farmer’s ability to convert inputs, such as land, labor, seeds, and fertilizers—into maximum possible output, like crop yields or livestock products. A technically efficient farm operates on the "production frontier," achieving the best output levels given the input set. However, evidence from developing countries suggests that smallholder farms typically operate at 50–80% technical efficiency, indicating considerable room for productivity enhancement (Ogundari, 2018).

Allocative efficiency assesses whether inputs are used in optimal proportions relative to their costs. A farmer may apply fertilizers correctly in terms of quantity, but if they rely on expensive synthetic variants when more affordable organic alternatives are available, they remain allocatively inefficient. Factors such as market imperfections, credit limitations, and poor access to price information often result in suboptimal input choices (Abdulai & Huffman, 2014).

Economic efficiency integrates both technical and allocative aspects, focusing on whether a farmer maximizes profit given prevailing input and output prices. Smallholder farmers often fall short in this area due to high input costs, volatile market prices, and limited access to profitable markets (Bravo-Ureta et al., 2020).

To measure RUE, agricultural economists commonly employ Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA). DEA, a non-parametric approach, benchmarks multiple farms against the most efficient ones to identify best practices, although it cannot account for random shocks like weather variability (Coelli et al., 2005). SFA, on the other hand, is a parametric method that separates inefficiency from stochastic events, making it particularly suitable for assessing performance in the volatile environments where smallholders operate (Kumbhakar & Lovell, 2000). Together, these analytical tools help identify gaps and inform targeted interventions to improve smallholder efficiency.

Key Constraints to Resource Use Efficiency in Smallholder Farms

Resource use efficiency (RUE) in smallholder farming systems is often compromised by a combination of structural, economic, and institutional challenges. One of the most critical constraints is land scarcity and fragmentation. Most smallholders cultivate less than two hectares of land, limiting their ability to benefit from economies of scale (Lowder et al., 2021). Compounding this issue, land degradation now affects approximately 33% of global farmland, eroding productivity and soil health (UNCCD, 2022). Additionally, insecure land tenure discourages long-term investments in conservation practices, irrigation systems, and agroforestry.

Labor shortages also hamper RUE. Smallholders typically rely on family labor, which often lacks the technical skills required for mechanized or precision farming. Seasonal labor unavailability delays critical operations like planting and harvesting, directly affecting yields. Similarly, access to capital and agricultural inputs remains limited. In sub-Saharan Africa, only 30% of smallholders have formal access to credit (World Bank, 2023), making it difficult to afford improved seeds, fertilizers, and pesticides.

Technology adoption is another bottleneck. Fewer than 5% of African smallholders utilize mechanized tools, and digital extension platforms are underutilized due to literacy and infrastructure gaps (AGRA, 2022). Socio-economic and institutional barriers further exacerbate inefficiencies. Female farmers, for instance, have 24% less access to productive resources than men (FAO, 2023), and only 20% of smallholders receive consistent agronomic support from public extension services (IFPRI, 2021). Poor market connectivity results in post-harvest losses of 30–40% due to inadequate storage and weak buyer networks (World Food Program, 2022).

To overcome these constraints and enhance RUE, several targeted strategies are necessary. On the farm level, practices such as Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) can boost yields by 50–200% (Vanlauwe et al., 2019), while water-saving methods like drip irrigation and rainwater harvesting can reduce water use by up to 60% (IWMI, 2021). Crop diversification and intercropping improve land utilization and resilience. Small-scale mechanization, like two-wheel tractors, can reduce labor costs by 40% (FAO, 2022). At the policy level, ensuring land tenure security, expanding subsidized input programs, promoting digital extension services, and empowering cooperatives can significantly strengthen smallholders’ capacity to use resources more efficiently and sustainably.

Conclusion

Enhancing resource use efficiency (RUE) in smallholder farms is not just a technical imperative, it is a socioeconomic and environmental necessity. As the cornerstone of food systems in developing countries, smallholders face a complex web of challenges, from land fragmentation and limited credit access to labor shortages, low technology adoption, and weak market linkages. These constraints collectively suppress productivity and limit the sector's contribution to sustainable development. However, the potential for transformation is equally immense. By addressing the structural and institutional barriers that limit efficiency, smallholder farms can evolve into resilient, market-driven enterprises capable of producing more with fewer inputs while minimizing environmental harm.

A combination of farm-level innovations, such as integrated soil fertility management, small-scale mechanization, and efficient irrigation, alongside supportive policy measures, including land tenure reform, digital advisory systems, and inclusive cooperatives, can drive this change. Moreover, targeted investments in research, gender-sensitive extension services, and rural infrastructure are essential to ensure equitable and widespread improvements. As global demand for food continues to rise and climate pressures intensify, improving RUE among smallholders is one of the most impactful strategies to secure food systems, empower rural communities, and foster long-term agricultural sustainability. The pathway is clear, what remains is the political and institutional will to act.

References: FAO; World Bank; AGRA; IFPRI; Vanlauwe, et al.; Ogundari; Abdulai & Huffman; Bravo-Ureta et al.; Coelli et al.; Kumbhakar & Lovell; Lowder et al.; World Food Program; Vanlauwe et al.; IWMI

Please note that the views expressed in this article are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of any organization.

The writer is affiliated with the Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam Sindh, Pakistan and can be reached at kzsain786@gmail.com

Related Stories